<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air Canada Flight 190 may have hit an &#8220;atmospheric bore&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/</link>
	<description>Reporting on Turbulence</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Video of undular bore found, see what Air Canada 190 felt - Turbulence Forecast Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/comment-page-1/#comment-34612</link>
		<dc:creator>Video of undular bore found, see what Air Canada 190 felt - Turbulence Forecast Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/#comment-34612</guid>
		<description>[...] posted a fascinating video of a undular bore, which may have caused the severe turbulence on Air Canada Flight 190, that injured 10 passengers and forced the plane to make an emergency [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted a fascinating video of a undular bore, which may have caused the severe turbulence on Air Canada Flight 190, that injured 10 passengers and forced the plane to make an emergency [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tb_neg</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/comment-page-1/#comment-34611</link>
		<dc:creator>tb_neg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/#comment-34611</guid>
		<description>See this previous blog post.
http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/05/northwest-airlines-flies-around-turbulence-while-others-rough-it/

Southwest came in close at 2nd place for avoidance.  Many forum posters like Southwest.  I also booked a Southwest flight, even in a Northwest hub city (although it was substantially cheaper than Northwest and I'm going with someone else).  

I would consider Southwest acceptable.  Many would argue they all try, but I would like to fly with those who try the best and most often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See this previous blog post.<br />
<a href="http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/05/northwest-airlines-flies-around-turbulence-while-others-rough-it/" rel="nofollow">http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/05/northwest-airlines-flies-around-turbulence-while-others-rough-it/</a></p>
<p>Southwest came in close at 2nd place for avoidance.  Many forum posters like Southwest.  I also booked a Southwest flight, even in a Northwest hub city (although it was substantially cheaper than Northwest and I&#8217;m going with someone else).  </p>
<p>I would consider Southwest acceptable.  Many would argue they all try, but I would like to fly with those who try the best and most often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/comment-page-1/#comment-34583</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/#comment-34583</guid>
		<description>Quick question... how would you rate Southwest in terms of turbulence avoidance? I'm flying from Chicago to Las Vegas next month.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question&#8230; how would you rate Southwest in terms of turbulence avoidance? I&#8217;m flying from Chicago to Las Vegas next month.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cranky Flier &#187; Was Air Canada&#8217;s Severe Turbulence Encounter Actually an Undular Bore?</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/comment-page-1/#comment-34576</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cranky Flier &#187; Was Air Canada&#8217;s Severe Turbulence Encounter Actually an Undular Bore?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulenceforecast.com/blog/2008/01/15/air-canada-flight-190-may-have-hit-an-atmospheric-bore/#comment-34576</guid>
		<description>[...] other information has been released, except that there was a computer problem. I read a post in the Turbulence Forecast blog today pointing to an article saying that it could have been a rare atmospheric (aka undular) bore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other information has been released, except that there was a computer problem. I read a post in the Turbulence Forecast blog today pointing to an article saying that it could have been a rare atmospheric (aka undular) bore [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
